Cuba’s Crisis Is Result of Cuban Socialism

Rafaela Cruz, a Cuban journalist and economist, asserts that Cuba’s current economic crisis is a result of its socialist system that concentrates  “political power in an elite, keeping the civilian population atomized and economically dependent on the State.”

“We are living through the result of six decades of a system – socialism, statism – that has caused more havoc wherever it has been implemented than the hordes of Attila the Hun. There is not a single historical example of a successful socialist economy in relation to its capitalist counterparts.”

“The people must be deprived of any hope for real, sustainable and growing improvement within socialism, by demonstrating to them in historical and economic terms that, as a parasitic system, it will always take more than it can give; but we must also eliminate all desire —through ignorance or short-termism— for improvement within this system, and stop rejoicing when the economic situation improves slightly —out of humanity, they say— when the only way out of this eternal crisis is to reach a situation so bad that the parasite’s own survival is impossible. And yes, for that we must suffer. Has any people ever achieved freedom and prosperity without paying a toll in suffering?

“The path to [Cuban] prosperity, to the dignity that only being free can bring, does not lie in improving socialism, but in killing it; and to do that we will probably have to suffer more hunger, more blackouts, more of all those deprivations that we have been suffering for decades — sometimes more, sometimes less — and that we will only completely overcome when socialism disappears . We have to reach our darkest moment if we ever want to see the light.”

=========================

Cruz, Crisis and socialism in Cuba: the road to the end, Diario de Cuba (Jan. 22, 2025) Here are references to other blog posts about Cruz. .  And here is a list of articles by Cruz in Diario de Cuba.

 

 

Cuba’s Unstoppable Spiral of Misery

Rafaela Cruz, a journalist for Diario de Cuba who lives in Havana, offers the following dire analysis of Cuba’s current circumstances. [1] Here is what she says.

“This year we’ve received only 48% of the fuel that was planned,” and “of the 43 million planned for the purchase of raw materials, spare parts, bread production, maintenance, and the repair of the boilers at the dairy factory , only seven million, 9% of the total slated, have been issued.”

“Food Industry Minister Alberto López recently acknowledged that “last year, out of 22 selected productions, there was a decrease in 20, and none of the goals set have been achieved this year.” However, what the minister is really recognizing is the bleak tomorrow that awaits a country not only incapable of improving, but one unable to even maintain its existing capital, which is what its current and future standard of living depends on.”

“Ministries, companies and other state conglomerates are unable to keep means of production (many stolen in 1959) in sound condition, so they are becoming ever less efficient and more unproductive, prone to more frequent and prolonged breakdowns, such that Cuba’s machinery’s productivity is less and less productive than what its manufacturers had projected, all while growing progressively more expensive, which is why Cuba is no longer competitive in anything but producing tobacco and fermenting rum… and the latter thanks to a French company.”

“With old and damaged machinery, industrial exploitation ratios become negative. Production in Cuba would yield losses instead of profits if the Government were not offsetting its capital costs by skimping on workers’ remuneration. Socialism always starts out with the state subsidizing the people, but it always ends with the people subsidizing the government.”

“How is the rest of the economy destined to fare when a high-priority agency like the Food Industry receives less than half of the fuel scheduled, and only seven of the 43 million that the plan estimated as necessary for its needs?”

“Every ‘planned’ economy tends to fail in its own planning, because the very act of ‘planning’ by centralized bodies prevents the plasticity essential for any ecosystem to realize its potential.”

“Paradoxically, planning, far from organizing, disorganizes the allocation of resources that, in a decentralized manner, a free market coordinates and allocates much more effectively, whenever prices are not interfered with.”

“The result of socialist planning (in capitalism there is planning, but it is decentralized) is that next year Cuba will have less of everything necessary to produce, so it will have even less revenue, so, in turn, it will be able to afford fewer imports. It is a spiral in which each productive cycle is more inefficient and less profitable than the previous one; a downward spiral until total collapse, and we are almost there.”

“Cubana de Aviación, Ferrocarriles de Cuba (Railways), Antilana de Acero (Steel), the sugar industry, and the enormous Flota Cubana de Pesca (Fishing Fleet) are just some examples of the many industries that have already gone belly up. Electricity generation, although going down the same path, cannot be left to die because the country would shut down and their game would be up. It is not known how long they will be able to weather this decline. Now they want to avert collapse using solar panels… which, after being installed, are bound to be breaking down in six months, because socialism itself is corrosive.”

“Without access to international loans, given its criminal record of defaults and its ongoing standoff with the United States, Castroism sustains itself by borrowing internally; first, through monetary devaluation (inflation), lowering workers’ real wages and spreading misery and dependence on remittances to survive; and, second, by not covering the costs of maintaining physical capital (machinery, buildings, roads, etc.) thus freeing up short-term resources for consumption that should have been earmarked for investment (maintenance, spare parts, new technology), a suicidal stopgap decision spawning a progressive reduction in productive capacity.”

“Even Tourism is suffering from the leprosy of decapitalization. It is more ‘eye-catching’ and efficient in the short term – both from a GDP and money laundering perspective – to open new hotels than to pay for the proper maintenance of old ones. Meanwhile, complaints from tourists about the poor state of Cuba’s hotel infrastructure, even at ones that are practically new, abound on social media.”

“To reverse this spiral of misery, Castroism would have to adopt a truly liberal economic policy, or find a new USSR or Venezuela to ‘adopt’ it. As none of these possibilities seem feasible, socialism in Cuba will continue, from victory to victory, until its final defeat, which will come in the form of economic collapse.”

“This collapse will probably be accompanied by a struggle between those in the Communist Party of Cuba, who are only relevant as long as this totalitarian system of confrontation with the United States lasts, and the military, which has money and could benefit from a corrupt form of capitalism, like Russia’s. The thread is pulled tight… time will tell where it breaks.”

This Blogger’s Comments

As this blogger already stated, “Regardless of your opinion on the Trading with the Enemy Act or on the initial or subsequent U.S. impositions of the embargo, it is utterly stupid now for the U.S. to extend it another year for at least the following reasons:

  • “The Cuban economy now is in catastrophic condition and is not posing any threat by itself to the U.S.
  • Ceasing the U.S. embargo now would provide some desperately needed economic and political relief to Cuba.
  • Cuba’s current condition has encouraged it to expand relations with the Soviet Union and China, which are threats to the U.S. in many ways, and ending the embargo now would be one way to counter the threats posed by these two powers and possibly lead to weakening, if not ultimately eliminating, Cuba’s relationships with those powers.
  • Given that the U.N. General Assembly now for many years overwhelmingly has approved resolutions condemning the embargo, ending the embargo now would gain support for the U.S. in the U.N.”[2]

======================

[1] Cruz, Cuba’s unstoppable spiral of misery, Diario de Cuba (Dec. 2, 2024).

[2] Another Granma Article Against the U.S. Embargo (Blockade), dwkcommentaries.com (Sept. 26, 2024).

Cuban Journalist Rejects U.S. Embargo as Cause of Cuba’s Turmoil 

A Cuban journalist, Rafaela Cruz, rejects its government’s claim that the U.S. embargo is the cause of the island’s poor exports.[1]

She asserts that “the embargo’s limitations are directed primarily against the Cuban government and not against the rest of the nation, as demonstrated by the fact that after only three years of private entrepreneurs in  Cuba, they  are already, with relative ease, trading with U.S. ports.”

“It is Castro’s totalitarianism, for whom the Government, State, party and people are the same thing, that is responsible for extending to the rest of the body of the nation economic limitations conceived against the Government, thus using the people as a hostage and shield against its political enemies.”

And the Cuban government has chosen to expand the impact of the embargo by choosing to limit the number of privately owned businesses.

“It is Castroism, not Washington, that prevents peasants from being true owners of the land they work. It is Castroism that prevents them from harvesting what they want. It is Castroism that prevents them from selling where and how they want. It is Castroism that prevents them from importing and exporting directly. And it is Castroism that prevents commercial and financial intermediation in the Cuban agricultural market, which would make possible the specialization of labor that, since the 18th century, has been known to be the basis for increased productivity.”

“The reality is that, today, Cuba does not export because it has nothing to export since Castroism destroyed industry and agriculture, first by taking over everything, then by managing it in the worst way. It is not a blockade, but socialist centralized planning that has annihilated the productive fabric of the country.”

Cuba’s “real blockade [is the one ] that it has  imposed on individual freedom since 1959, destroying more than the economy, the entire nation.”

=========================

[1] Cruz, The cost of the blockade against Cuba, Diario de Cuba (Oct. 28, 2024).

 

 

How Cuban Government Fuels Inflation

Rafaela Cruz, a Cuban analyst for Diario de Cuba, asserts, “Ending inflation is not a priority for the Cuban regime.” Instead, “the Government exacerbates inflation as another [means] to maintain power and profit” by the following means:

1. “They raise taxes when economic activity is almost non-existent.”

2. “Subsidies (direct distributions) decrease when food is more expensive and scarce.”

3. Tax incentives for the creation of MSMEs are withdrawn even though their number is [very] low.”

4. “Castling is the monopoly of foreign trade, causing bottlenecks that make imports more expensive.”

5. “Salaries of some workers rise at the expense of [reducing] those of the rest.”

6. “Increase public spending by printing large amounts of money.”

7. “Prices of basic goods and services … rise.”

8. “The peso remains overvalued, which encourages imports.”

9. “Little, and poorly invested, in sectors far from domestic inspection.”

======================
Cruz,  nine reasons that show that the Cuban Government fuels inflation, Diario de Cuba (Feb. 28, 2024.