Discovery of Lone U.S. Response to U.N.’s Latest Condemnation of the U.S. Embargo of Cuba      

Previous posts provided details about the U.N. General Assembly’s October 30, 2024, overwhelming adoption of  a resolution condemning the U.S. embargo of Cuba, including the brief remarks at that session  of U.S. Deputy Ambassador Paul Folmsbee, as well as some criticisms of that resolution.[1]

This blogger unexpectedly found what appears to be the only official U.S. comments on that U.N.. General Assembly resolution at the very end of the State Department’s Press Briefing on October 30 by Matthew Miller, the Department’s Spokesperson.[2]

Matthew Miller’s Comments

A journalist opened this subject with the following comments/questions and Miller’s responses:

  • Journalist: “T]he vote happened today in the UN on the Cuba embargo. Do you know what the vote was?”
  • Miller: “Yeah, it was a predictable vote in line with past votes. (Laughter.)
  • Journalist: “ Exactly. But just for the record, let’s say, it was 187 to 2 —with one abstention. And the one abstention wasn’t even a Pacific Island nation. It was Moldova.”
  • Journalist: “So at what point, though, are you guys going to realize that the entire world, with the exception of you and Israel, thinks that the embargo is a really bad idea and should be stopped?
  • Miller: “Look, I think we are quite clear on the opinion of other countries around the world. And it’s one with which we disagree. We take their opinion seriously, but we make our own policy determinations . . .on these matters. . . Certainly we would welcome other countries sharing our opinion in this. But we’re not blind to the history of countries around the world having a very different view of this matter. It long predates this administration. But as I said, we make our own determinations.
  • Journalist: “What about the Obama administration disagreement? Were they wrong?”
  • Miller: “I don’t have anything to comment on previous administration decisions.”

The Department’s Official Statement on U.S.-Cuba Relations[3]

“The United States seeks a stable, prosperous, and free country for the Cuban people. The United States pursues limited engagement with Cuba that advances our national interests and empowers the Cuban people while restricting economic practices that disproportionately benefit the Cuban government or its military, intelligence, or security agencies at the expense of the Cuban people. The U.S. government seeks to promote human rights, religious freedom, and democracy, encourages the development of telecommunications and the internet in Cuba, supports the growth of Cuba’s nascent private sector and civil society, and engages in areas that advance the interests of the United States and the Cuban people. The United States is committed to supporting safe, orderly, and legal migration from Cuba through the effective implementation of the U.S.-Cuba Migration Accords. Due to injuries sustained by our diplomatic community in Havana, visa processing for most Cuban applicants is presently taking place in third countries.”

On Bilateral Economic Relations, the State Department says, “Although economic sanctions remain in place, the United States is the largest provider of food and agricultural products to Cuba, with exports of those goods valued at $220.5 million in 2018. The United States is also a significant supplier of humanitarian goods to Cuba, including medicines and medical products, with total value of all exports to Cuba of $275.9 million. Remittances from the United States, estimated at $3.5 billion for 2017, play an important role in Cuba’s state-controlled economy.”

U.S. Integrated Country Strategy for Cuba[4]

In recent years the State Department has adopted a uniform structure for integrated country strategies for every country in the world. Here are the Chief of Mission Priorities for that document for Cuba:

“The Mission is focused on five key priorities: the protection of American citizens in and visiting Cuba, supporting Cubans who seek to exercise their universal human rights, promoting economic freedom and an empowered private sector, protecting the national security of the United States and its citizens, and ensuring the safety and well-being of staff assigned in Havana.”

“Ensuring Consistent American Citizen Services”

 “Immigration from Cuba to the United States continues to increase the number of Cuban Americans who, more than ever, are returning to the island to maintain their connections and support family with remittances and necessary supplies. The Mission regularly engages with the Cuban government concerning their rights and to ensure consular access to imprisoned American citizens, many of whom the Cuban government considers to be “residents” of Cuba, and thus citizens of Cuba regardless of their U.S. citizenship. The

“The Mission will continue robust communication and outreach efforts to educate travelers on the difficulties of traveling to Cuba and the assistance the U.S. Embassy can provide when required. Much of this communication centers around disaster preparedness, access to funds while traveling, hospital care, death assistance, and welfare visits while an individual is in prison. Continued relationship building with partners to assist U.S. citizens will remain a crucial priority for supporting U.S. citizens abroad.”

Supporting Human Rights

“A generational transition to a post-Cuban Revolution leadership has failed to create significant changes: the Cuban government continues to use repressive measures, including incarceration, coercive economic policies, and misinformation to suppress the Cuban peoples’ freedoms. Approximately 1,000 political prisoners remain unjustly imprisoned in Cuba. Cuban authorities regularly harass, imprison, or force into exile those who express dissenting opinions.”

Encouraging an Empowered, Innovative, and Inclusive Cuban Society

“Cuba is experiencing the worst economic crisis in its history. Food scarcity, electricity and water shortages, and inflation make life difficult for Cubans. Incremental reforms of Cuba’s centrally planned economy – including the legal recognition of micro, small, and medium enterprises – have been insufficient to align Cuba’s economic needs with the realities of doing business in a global economy. The Embassy will continue to seek new ways to engage Cuba’s independent economic actors, foster Cuba’s entrepreneurial eco-system, while expanding outreach to improve the economic outlook for Afro- Cubans, women, and other historically disadvantaged groups.”

Protecting the Security of the United States and its Citizens

“Over 500,000 Cubans have migrated to the United States in the last three years. It is in the interest of the United States and Cuba to ensure that migration from Cuba is safe, orderly, and legal. The Embassy has resumed migration-related services in Havana after a several-year hiatus, to include the issuance of all categories of immigrant visas and the processing of cases under the Cuban Family Reunification Parole (CFRP) Program. The mission will also seek to maintain and expand the existing cooperation between the United States and Cuba on matters related to maritime migration, law enforcement, health and environmental cooperation, and disaster response.”

 “Building a Management Platform to Best Support U.S. goals and Future Mission Growth”

“Embassy Havana’s chancery is a culturally significant but obsolete building that has suffered from decades of delayed maintenance and significant damage from its seaside location. The Cuban government routinely denies the secure shipments to perform necessary maintenance. Given these challenges, Embassy Havana is building a management platform prepared to support U.S. priorities now and into the future, especially ensuring a safe working and living environment. We are still in the process of returning to “normal operations” following a reduction of Embassy staffing to emergency levels in 2017, and restarting full immigrant visa and limited NIV operations in 2023.”

===========================

[1] U.N. General Assembly Overwhelmingly Adopts Resolution Condemning U.S. Embargo of Cuba, dwkcommentaries.com (Oct. 30, 2024); Criticisms of the Recent U.N. General Assembly Resolution Against the U.S. Embargo of Cuba,   dwkcommentaries.com (Oct. 31, 2024).

[2] State Dep’t, Department Press Briefing—October 30, 2024); State Dep’t, Matthew Miller (Department Spokesperson bio).

[3] State Dep’t, U.S.-Cuba Relations,

[4] State Dep’t, Integrated Country Strategy: Cuba.

U.N. General Assembly Overwhelmingly Adopts Resolution Condemning U.S. Embargo of Cuba       

On October 30, 2024, the U.N. General Assembly overwhelmingly passed Cuba’s resolution condemning the U.S. embargo pf the island (187 to 2 with 4 abstentions).The U.S. and Israel again voted against the resolution while the abstentions came from Moldova, Ukraine, Somalia and Venezuela. Here now is a summary of that resolution and the General Assembly proceedings regarding same. [1]  A subsequent post will examine some of the criticisms against that U.N. resolution.

Summary of the Resolution

The resolution was titled “Necessity of ending the economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba,”

“The resolution reaffirmed, among other principles, the sovereign equality of States, non-intervention and non-interference in their internal affairs and freedom of international trade and navigation.”

The Resolution “also reiterated its call for all States to refrain from promulgating or applying restrictive laws and measures, in line with their obligations under the UN Charter and international law, which, inter alia, reaffirm the freedom of trade and navigation.”

The Resolution “once again urges States that have and continue to apply such laws and measures to take the steps necessary to repeal or invalidate them as soon as possible in accordance with their legal regime.”

The Resolution also “recalled the measures adopted by US President Barack Obama in 2015 and 2016 to modify several aspects of the application of the embargo, “which contrast with the measures applied since 2017 to reinforce its implementation.

Remarks About the Resolution[2]

Cuba’s Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez urged the assembly to support “reason and justice,the U.N. Charter and international law and back the resolution.”

The Foreign Minister said the U.S. embargo has imposed “the most cruel and long-lasting unilateral coercive measures that have ever been applied against any country” and that it constitutes “a crime of genocide” and an “ act of economic warfare during times of peace.” Moreover,” the American aim is to weaken Cuba’s economic life, leave its people hungry and desperate, and overthrow the government.”

Rodriguez also blamed the U.S. government’s “maximum pressure policy” aimed at depriving Cuba of the imported fuel it relies on for a widespread blackout this month, including when Hurricane Oscar lashed the island.”

U.S. Deputy Ambassador Paul Folmsbee told the Assembly after the vote that the “United States stands with the Cuban people. We strongly support their pursuit of a future with respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.” He also added the following comments:

  • “Approximately 1,000 unjustly detained political prisoners remain behind bars in Cuba – more than at any point in Cuba’s recent history. Nearly 700 of those detentions are connected to the July 11, 2021, historic protests. These people have languished in horrible conditions in Cuban jails for exercising their freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly to demand better living conditions from their government.”
  • “Despite Cuba’s membership in the UN Human Rights Council, the Cuban government has delayed responding to several requests by special procedures that mandate holders of the UN Human Rights Council send independent experts to Cuba, who would help advance respect for human rights, including freedom of expression, freedom of religion or belief, and the freedom of peaceful assembly. Some of these requests have remained pending for more than 10 years.”
  • “Sanctions are one element of our broader effort to advance democracy and promote respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Cuba. We therefore oppose this resolution.”
  • “That said, we recognize the challenges the Cuban people face. That is why U.S. sanctions include exemptions and authorizations relating to exports of food, medicine, and other basic goods to Cuba.”
  • “The United States remains a significant source of basic goods to the Cuban people. In 2023, the United States exported nearly $336 million in agricultural products and authorized another $100 billion in humanitarian exports, demonstrating America’s desire to help the Cuban people.”

To scattered booing in the assembly chamber, Folmsbee concluded by saying the General Assembly should urge the Cuban government “to adhere to its human rights obligations and listen to the Cuban people and their aspirations to determine their own future.”

==========================

[1] Lederer, U.N. General Assembly condemns the US economic embargo of Cuba for a 32nd year, Wash. Post (Oct. 30, 2024); Bruno Rodriguez at the UN: “Who can believe that US policy is to help Cuba?, Granma (Oct. 30, 2024); The great US irony: are sanctions meant to help Cuba?, Granma (Oct. 30, 2024).This blog has published posts about previous U.N. resolutions against the U.S. embargo. (See, e.g., “U.S. Embargo of Cuba” section in List of Posts to dekcommentaries—Topical: Cuba [as of 5/4/20].

[2] U.S. Mission to the U.N., Explanation of Vote on a UN General Assembly Resolution on the Cuba Embargo (Oct. 30, 2014).